[Haskell-cafe] Re: Weird ghci behaviour?
jonathanccast at fastmail.fm
Wed Nov 14 02:22:16 EST 2007
On 13 Nov 2007, at 11:03 PM, Jules Bean wrote:
> Just to be clear: my proposal is that if you want it to go faster
> you do
> ghci foo.hi
> ghci foo.o
> ... so you still have the option to run on compiled code.
> My suggestion is simply that "ghci foo.hs" is an instruction to
> load source code (similarly :load); while "ghci foo.o" is obviously
> an instruction to load compiled code.
Even just having
:m + *Foo
always interpret Foo (giving an error only if the source isn't
would be an improvement. And wouldn't alter any /non-error/ behavior
that exists now.
More information about the Haskell-Cafe