[Haskell-cafe] Re: Very crazy
andrewcoppin at btinternet.com
Tue Sep 25 09:21:35 EDT 2007
Martin Lütke wrote:
> Dominic Steinitz schrieb:
>> Look at the type of (.).(.) which should tell you how to compose functions
>> with more than one variable. Mind you, I don't think it improves readability.
> Interesting function. It got a sibling: (.)(.) :: (a1 -> b -> c) -> a1
> -> (a -> b) -> a -> c
> Anybody knows how to intepret that? I tried to call it with (++) "t"
> (++"s") "it" but suddenly got distracted.
All I know is that most of this stuff looks like ASCII art - and perhaps
I need to see a doctor...
More information about the Haskell-Cafe