[Haskell-cafe] poll: how can we help you contribute to darcs?
bit at mutantlemon.com
Mon Aug 4 08:50:04 EDT 2008
What about the idea of creating a GUI interface to darcs? I love the
command line as much as the next guy, but I think darcs could really
benefit from a polished GUI. I used tortoise darcs on a small project
a while ago and it was pretty nice, but I think there is potential for
I think that if darcs had a usable GUI then it would be a great
advantage over other its competitors and it could tremendously
increase its user base.
I have been thinking about making a gtk2hs darcs frontend for a while
now, what does everyone think about this?
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 6:45 PM, Eric Kow <eric.kow at gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear Haskellers,
> I would like to take an informal poll for the purposes of darcs
> recruitment. Could you please complete this sentence for me?
> "I would contribute to darcs if only..."
> The answers I am most interested in hearing go beyond "... I had more
> time". For instance, if you are contributing to other Haskell/volunteer
> projects, why are you contributing more to them, rather than darcs?
> The context:
> Lately, darcs has suffered a setback: the GHC team has decided that it
> is now time to switch to a different system, like git or Mercurial.
> This is probably a good thing for GHC and for us. By the way, good
> luck to them, and thanks for everything! (better GHC == better darcs)
> But where is darcs going? For now, we are going to have to focus on
> what we do best, providing precision merging and a consistent user
> interface for small-to-medium sized projects. I want more, though! I
> want to see darcs 2.1 come out next year, performance enhanced out the
> wazoo, and running great on Windows. And I want to see Future Darcs,
> the universal revision control system, seamlessly integrating with
> everybody else.
> We need to learn to do better so that darcs can achieve this kind of
> wild success. For example, whereas darcs suffers from the "day job"
> problem, xmonad has had to turn developers away!
> As Don mentions, this is partly thanks to their extreme accessibility
> (better self-documentation). But does anyone have more specific ideas
> about things we need to change so that you can contribute to darcs?
> How do we hit critical hacker mass?
> I have jotted down some other thoughts here regarding recruitment here:
> In the meantime, if you have been discouraged from hacking on darcs,
> we want to know why, and how we can change things!
> Haskell-Cafe mailing list
> Haskell-Cafe at haskell.org
More information about the Haskell-Cafe