[Haskell-cafe] Valid Haskell characters

[Andy Smith]

2008/8/26 Deborah Goldsmith <dgoldsmith at mac.com>:
> It sounds like the properties you want are "Case" and "General Category".
> Maybe the spec should be more explicit on exactly how the definitions map
> onto Unicode properties, so there is no ambiguity.

This is proposed for Haskell'.
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/haskell-prime/wiki/UnicodeInHaskellSource
says: "The report should at least be absolutely clear about which
Unicode character properties (N, Ll, Lu, Sm, etc.) correspond to which
lexical class in the syntax." I don't know if there's any difference
in how current Haskell compilers handle this.

Andy