[Haskell-cafe] Re: ANNOUNCE: gitit 0.2 release - wiki using HAppS, git, pandoc

Hugo Pacheco hpacheco at gmail.com
Wed Dec 3 21:06:37 EST 2008


I think that Anatoly was suggestion a bridge between markdown and haddock
syntax.
Of course gitit would read haddock-documented sources and generate different
results than haddock itself (showing highlighted source code is the most
significant).

Being practical, this is very close to the markdownish literate haskell you
are suggesting.

hugo

On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 1:54 AM, John MacFarlane <jgm at berkeley.edu> wrote:

> +++ Anatoly Yakovenko [Dec 03 08 17:03 ]:
> > This is pretty cool.  I was wondering how much work would it be for
> > gitit to be able to use markdown from the comment sections in source
> > files?  It would be a really good way to manage documentation.
> >
> > Basically I would like to be able to point gitit at an existing git
> > repo, and have it provide a wiki interface to all the documentation so
> > developers can view and modify it.
>
> You can do something like that now. You can specify the repository
> directory in a configuration file. Anything in the repository (even
> in subdirectories) with a ".page" extension will be served up as a
> wiki page. So you'd have to use a ".page" extension for your markdown
> documentation. Everything else in the repository will appear in the
> index. Source code files will be automatically syntax-highlighted, and
> you can even view history and diffs through the wiki interface.
>
> But I guess what you want is for the documentation to be in comments
> in the source files themselves, not in separate files.  I'm not sure
> how to do that -- would the idea be to show just the documentation,
> perhaps marked off with some special notation, and not the source?
> But then we lose a nice feature, the ability to view source files.
> I'm open to ideas.
>
> Soon, gitit will contain support for pages in markdownish literate
> Haskell, which might be the best of both worlds for Haskell projects.
> (They'd still need the .page extension, since some .lhs files are
> LaTeX lhs, but one could use hard links, or there could be a
> configuration option to treat .lhs files as wiki pages.)
>
> John
>
> _______________________________________________
> Haskell-Cafe mailing list
> Haskell-Cafe at haskell.org
> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
>



-- 
www.di.uminho.pt/~hpacheco
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-cafe/attachments/20081204/0e6344f7/attachment.htm


More information about the Haskell-Cafe mailing list