[Haskell-cafe] Monades - I've got it! (hopefully)

[Derek Elkins]

On Wed, 2008-12-24 at 11:03 -0600, Andrew Wagner wrote:
> I wouldn't call it a "programming model" so much as a library. A
> "programming model" sounds to me like an idiom, whereas there's an
> actual typeclass in the standard library called Monad. Yes, there's
> special sugar built into GHC (and, likely, any haskell implementation)
> for it, but it really is at its heart just a typeclass.

do notation is in the Haskell 98 standard.