[Haskell-cafe] Re: Why purely in haskell?
barsoap at web.de
Thu Jan 10 10:36:30 EST 2008
jerzy.karczmarczuk at info.unicaen.fr wrote:
> Niko Korhonen writes:
> > Although it could be argued that laziness is the cause of some very
> > obscure bugs... <g>
> > Niko
> Example, PLEASE.
[1..] == [1..]
, for assumed operational semantics of ones own axiomatic semantics.
Bugs are only a misunderstanding away.
(c) this sig last receiving data processing entity. Inspect headers for
past copyright information. All rights reserved. Unauthorised copying,
hiring, renting, public performance and/or broadcasting of this
More information about the Haskell-Cafe