[Haskell-cafe] Re: Why purely in haskell?

[Achim Schneider]

jerzy.karczmarczuk at info.unicaen.fr wrote:

> Achim Schneider answers my question to somebody else (Niko Korhonen): 
> 
> >> > Although it could be argued that laziness is the cause of some
> >> > very obscure bugs... <g> 
> >> > Niko 
> >> 
> >> Example, PLEASE.  
> >> 
> > [1..] == [1..]
> 
> Whatever you may say more, this is neither obscure nor a bug. I still
> wait for a relevant example. But I don't insist too much... 
> 
It's not an example of a bug, but of a cause.


-- 
(c) this sig last receiving data processing entity. Inspect headers for
past copyright information. All rights reserved. Unauthorised copying,
hiring, renting, public performance and/or broadcasting of this
signature prohibited.