[Haskell-cafe] Re: Hmm, what license to use?
barsoap at web.de
Fri Sep 26 09:34:50 EDT 2008
Manlio Perillo <manlio_perillo at libero.it> wrote:
> Colin Paul Adams ha scritto:
> >>>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas Davie <tom.davie at gmail.com> writes:
> > Thomas> Sorry, this isn't the most relevant comment to the
> > Thomas> discussion, but I thought I'd add my own thought re the
> > Thomas> gpl/lgpl. My personal feeling is that the point of open
> > Thomas> source is to allow people the freedom to do what they
> > Thomas> want with a piece of code. The GPL/LGPL go completely
> > Thomas> against this idea, in that they restrict what I can do
> > Thomas> with the code to only things that are similarly
> > Thomas> licensed.
> > No, the point of free software is to prevent people from denying
> > other people the right to use the code.
> > Allowing people to do what they like at the expense of other people
> > is not freedom.
> When I compare GPL and MIT/BSD licenses, I do a simple reasoning.
> Suppose a doctor in a battle field meet a badly injuried enemy.
> Should he help the enemy?
I think your example is a little flawed, I'd see it like this:
Is the patient conscious?
Is he still holding his gun?
If yes, get the hell away.
(c) this sig last receiving data processing entity. Inspect headers
for copyright history. All rights reserved. Copying, hiring, renting,
performance and/or broadcasting of this signature prohibited.
More information about the Haskell-Cafe