[Haskell-cafe] "Rebox Package" or "To Hackage or not to Hackage"

[John Van Enk]

Hi List,

I've recently had a situation where I used the same pattern quite a bit
 while reducing and evaluating an AST. I quickly wrapped the operation in a
package and stuck it on github.

http://github.com/sw17ch/rebox/blob/master/src/Data/Rebox.hs

I'm wondering two things:
1) Does any one recognize the pattern I'm using here as something with a
different name?
2) Is this worth sticking on Hackage? It's trivial, but we have plenty of
trivial concepts on Hackage (and it's not a bad thing).

Any feedback would be great.

/jve
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-cafe/attachments/20091208/7fdf4866/attachment.html