[Haskell-cafe] speed: ghc vs gcc vs jhc

[Bulat Ziganshin]

Hello John,

Saturday, February 21, 2009, 2:14:25 AM, you wrote:

> Heh. He probably meant something more like "jhc is not a production
> compiler" which is true for a lot of projects. For projects of
> substantial size or that require many extensions, jhc falls somewhat
> short. It is getting better though. Of course, help is always
> appreciated. :)

what is "substantial size"? can jhc be used for video codec, i.e.
probably no extensions - just raw computations, and thousands or tens
of thousands LOCs?


-- 
Best regards,
 Bulat                            mailto:Bulat.Ziganshin at gmail.com