[Haskell-cafe] faster compiling for ghc
xs at xaph.net
Thu Nov 12 07:10:54 EST 2009
Bulat Ziganshin wrote:
> it's impossible to interpret haskell - how can you do type inference?
> hugs, like ghci, is bytecode interpreter. the difference is their
> implementation languages - haskell vs C
We use Standard ML for the Isabelle/HOL theorem prover, and it's
interpreted, even has an interactive toplevel. It uses type inference,
does it not? In fact, in a not-very-serious discussion at some point of
SML came up.
What makes Haskell so different that it can't be interpreted in the SML
More information about the Haskell-Cafe