[Haskell-cafe] Why MTL and Transformers?
ganesh.sittampalam at credit-suisse.com
Tue Oct 13 03:24:19 EDT 2009
Gregory Crosswhite wrote:
> Something that I have been wondering for a while is: why are there
> *still* two monad transformer libraries with seemingly identical
> functionality, especially given that they have conflicting
> namespaces? It creates stupid problems like the one that Erik
> encountered and had to work around.
> I recognize that this situation most likely came about via historical
> accident rather than by intention, but why does it continue to be
The intention is to migrate to transformers, which has a slightly better
design and separates out the functional dependencies into a separate
package (monads-fd), thus allowing use of the type families variant
This has been discussed to some extent on the libraries list and a
workable strategy involving making a new mtl 2.0 that re-exports
transformers has been suggested. However the migration from extralibs to
the Haskell Platform put the brakes on further progress for a bit.
Now that this migration is essentially complete I have been intending to
revive the proposal but haven't got round to it yet. Please do jump in
and do so yourself if you feel motivated!
Please access the attached hyperlink for an important electronic communications disclaimer:
More information about the Haskell-Cafe