[Haskell-cafe] I read somewhere that for 90% of a wide class of computing problems, you only need 10% of the source code in Haskell, that you would in an imperative language.

[Andrew Coppin]

Peter Verswyvelen wrote:
> I really doubt people tend to think in either way. It's not even sure 
> our thinking can be modeled with computing no?

Well, try this: Go ask a random person how you add up a list of numbers. 
Most of them will say something about adding the first two together, 
adding the third to that total, and so forth. In other words, the step 
by step instructions. Very few of them will answer that the sum of an 
empty list is defined to be zero, and the sum of a non-empty list is 
defined to be the first number plus the sum of the list tail.

Then again, few non-programmers will set anything about creating a 
counter variable and initialising it to zero either; this is a 
programming "artifact". (Humans don't think like this internally, but 
most programming languages conceptually require it.) Nobody has much 
difficulty with this, so maybe the only problem with Haskell is that 
everybody learns to program "the other way" first, before they get to 
Haskell...