[Haskell-cafe] Re: AlternativePrelude extension
Roel van Dijk
vandijk.roel at gmail.com
Sun Jan 17 06:50:22 EST 2010
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 12:27 PM, Ketil Malde <ketil at malde.org> wrote:
> I think there might be justification for doing it multiple places. The
> cabal file tells you what is required to build the package, the pragmas
> what is required to build each source file.
> Perhaps cabal should complain when source files use pragmas not
> declared in the cabal file, and perhaps also warn about options in the
> cabal file not used in any source file.
The "extensions" field in a cabal package description is a bit tricky.
The documentation states "A list of Haskell extensions used by every
module". This might give the impression that it documents the various
extensions used in a package. What it actually does is enable those
extensions for every module.
Duncan's comments on this ticket are enlightening:
I think the idea of adding a new field "used-extensions" warrants a
More information about the Haskell-Cafe