[Haskell-cafe] MState: A consistent State monad for concurrent
ml at n-sch.de
Fri Jul 2 16:32:37 EDT 2010
On 02.07.2010 20:05, Jason Dagit wrote:
> In other words, don't be shy!
Ok, thanks for the reply! :) However, a question about haddock:
evalMState :: Forkable m
=> MState t m a -- ^ Action to evaluate
-> t -- ^ Initial state value
-> m a
This (and run-/execMState) gets rendered incorrectly. "Action to
evaluate" is completly lost and "Initial state value" has moved one
upwards to the "MState t m a". Is that a haddock bug or my fault?
More information about the Haskell-Cafe