[Haskell-cafe] MState: A consistent State monad for concurrent applications

[Daniel Fischer]

On Friday 02 July 2010 22:32:37, Nils Schweinsberg wrote:
> On 02.07.2010 20:05, Jason Dagit wrote:
> > In other words, don't be shy!
>
> Ok, thanks for the reply! :) However, a question about haddock:
>
>      evalMState :: Forkable m
>                 => MState t m a      -- ^ Action to evaluate
>                 -> t                 -- ^ Initial state value
>                 -> m a
>
> This (and run-/execMState) gets rendered incorrectly. "Action to
> evaluate" is completly lost and "Initial state value" has moved one
> upwards to the "MState t m a". Is that a haddock bug or my fault?

Probably Haddock's fault. It had that bug for a while.