[Haskell-cafe] MState: A consistent State monad for concurrent applications

[Ivan Lazar Miljenovic]

Daniel Fischer <daniel.is.fischer at web.de> writes:

> On Friday 02 July 2010 22:32:37, Nils Schweinsberg wrote:
>> On 02.07.2010 20:05, Jason Dagit wrote:
>> > In other words, don't be shy!
>>
>> Ok, thanks for the reply! :) However, a question about haddock:
>>
>>      evalMState :: Forkable m
>>                 => MState t m a      -- ^ Action to evaluate
>>                 -> t                 -- ^ Initial state value
>>                 -> m a
>>
>> This (and run-/execMState) gets rendered incorrectly. "Action to
>> evaluate" is completly lost and "Initial state value" has moved one
>> upwards to the "MState t m a". Is that a haddock bug or my fault?
>
> Probably Haddock's fault. It had that bug for a while.

It's been fixed in the 2.7 release apparently (I haven't upgraded, so
I haven't checked that myself).

-- 
Ivan Lazar Miljenovic
Ivan.Miljenovic at gmail.com
IvanMiljenovic.wordpress.com