[Haskell-cafe] Hugs Was: Rewriting a famous library and using the same name: pros and cons

[Joachim Breitner]

Hi,

Am Samstag, den 03.07.2010, 23:18 +1000 schrieb Ivan Lazar Miljenovic:
> Stephen Tetley <stephen.tetley at gmail.com> writes:
> 
> > I think it was Hugs compliant as least for some revisions - I seem to
> > remember looking at it before I switched to GHC.
> 
> People still use Hugs? :p
> 
> A bit more seriously: is there any listing anywhere of which extensions
> Hugs supports?

I’d also be interested in the answer to this. Debian has basically
stopped building hugs packages of hackage libraries, but hugs is still
provided on Debian – though I haven’t heared of any users of it for a
while.

Greetings,
Joachim

-- 
Joachim "nomeata" Breitner
Debian Developer
  nomeata at debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C
  JID: nomeata at joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-cafe/attachments/20100703/88e7da1b/attachment.bin