[Haskell-cafe] Re: How does one get off haskell?
Alberto G. Corona
agocorona at gmail.com
Fri Jun 18 09:25:32 EDT 2010
The fast write-only way:
- generate C code with JHC (no haskell runtime)
- use a C-to-java converter , for example, c2j (http://www.novosoft-us.com)
At least you can laugh at the generated code.
anyone tried that?
2010/6/18 wren ng thornton <wren at freegeek.org>:
> Edward Z. Yang wrote:
>> Excerpts from Paul Lotti's message of Thu Jun 17 15:33:30 -0400 2010:
>>> Same feelings here. I work in a company that uses C++/Java and the best
>>> I could
>>> manage was to use Haskell for prototyping and then deliver in Java. This
>>> out twice so far. The downside is having to translate it later.
>> *Shudders at the though.* Must be a what, x10 size blow-up?
> I've done that too. It works fairly well for certain kinds of
> programs/problems, but you have to be careful about your abstractions.
> For instance, Java Generics are no substitute for real parametric
> polymorphism. They only work for the simplest kind of container/element
> polymorphism, interact poorly (i.e., not at all) with subclassing, and
> explode with many of the higher-order tricks common in idiomatic Haskell.
> Any sort of higher-order programming (HOFs, point-free style, CPS,
> parametricity,...) rarely translates well--- especially if you want to avoid
> code bloat and have anything resembling idiomatic Java. Though sometimes
> defunctionalization can help.
> The code blow up varies. 10x is on the good side of things and indicates a
> good match of abstractions. 20x or 30x is more common I think. But if you're
> relying on any libraries or fancy datastructures, you'll be lucky not to
> have to reimplement everything...
> Live well,
> Haskell-Cafe mailing list
> Haskell-Cafe at haskell.org
More information about the Haskell-Cafe