[Haskell-cafe] Re: Haskell web development entries on the Wiki

[Christopher Done]

On 2 October 2010 22:13, Michael Snoyman <michael at snoyman.com> wrote:
> I understand the advantages to splitting into multiple pages, but on
> the other hand it *does* make it more difficult to locate information.

It does? What's an example? I'll fix it.

> My guess is a good search function on the wiki will make that point
> moot.

Probably!

> * Does pass.net still exist anywhere? Same for parallel web.

I couldn't find any references to pass.net.

> * Should older, unmaintained stuff (Wash, for example) be removed
> entirely, placed on its own page or be obviously marked as
> unmaintained?

Yes, I think so. There are a lot of frameworks on that page that are
just cluttering it up, most of them are unmaintained or don't really
have a big user-base. Perhaps we should split it to Active /
Recommended  and  Inactive / Unevaluated or something like that. If I
was looking for web frameworks I'd want to know which ones were
actively maintained and then *maybe* what other ones there are. It
could well be two pages. Frameworks/Active or Recommended_Frameworks
and then the other. I'm not sure. Thoughts, chaps?

On 2 October 2010 22:24, Gwern Branwen <gwern0 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> * Should we rename HAppS to Happstack everywhere?
>
> I think we should. No one is using the old HAppS code, so references
> are just misleading.

Agreed.