[Haskell-cafe] Decompressing and http-enumerator
michael at snoyman.com
Tue Aug 30 06:11:14 CEST 2011
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 6:27 AM, Erik de Castro Lopo
<mle+hs at mega-nerd.com> wrote:
> Michael Snoyman wrote:
>> I'm wondering what the most appropriate way to handle this is.
> Just to get my thoughts in order I'll back track a little.
> In the HTTP repsonse, we have two header fields, content-type
> and content-encoding. For the later (which may be absent) we can
> have encodings of gzip or chunked (possibly others).
Actually, chunked would go under transfer-encoding, but I think that's
irrelevant for the rest of this discussion.
> Some examples:
> content-type content-encoding current practice
> text/html gzip gunzip it in H.E.
> text/html chunked unchunk it in H.E.
> For the case where H.E might be used as part of a HTTP proxy
> we also have a rawBody option that disables both the unchunking
> and the gunzipping. This rawBody functionality works now; I'm
> using it.
> We now add to the above a file type where the content-type is
> application/x-tar and the content-encoding is gzipped but from
> the filename part of the URL, a user may well expect that
> we get a tar.gz file but where H.E. currently gunzips it on
> the fly.
> So, on to your suggestion:
>> Maybe a dontDecompress record, looking like:
>> type ContentType = ByteString
>> dontDecompress :: ContentType -> Bool
>> Then browser behavior would be:
>> browserDecompress = (== "application/x-tar")
>> and current behavior would be:
>> defaultDecompress = const False
> I think we should invert the logic of this (to avoid
> double negatives) so we have:
> type ContentType = ByteString
> decompress :: ContentType -> Bool
> browserDecompress = (/== "application/x-tar")
> defaultDecompress = const True
No objections from me.
> Was the idea that this decompress field then gets added to
> the Request record?
> If so, would simpleHttp be modified to be:
> simpleHttp :: String -> (ContentType -> Bool) -> m L.ByteString
> and exporting both browserDecompress and defaultDecompress so
> they can be used as two sane defaults for the second parameter?
I don't want to go this route actually. I think simpleHttp should have
the exact same type signature it has route now (thus living up to the
name "simple"). It likely makes sense to use browserDecompress as the
default for simpleHttp, and defaultDecompress as the default for
parseUrl. Though I don't really have a strong opinion on this either.
In either case, I'm thinking we should rename defaultDecompress to
alwaysDecompress (my mistake to start off with), to properly indicate
what it does.
More information about the Haskell-Cafe