[Haskell-cafe] Conduit Error Output: Control.Monad.Trans.Resource.stateCleanup
michael at snoyman.com
Tue Feb 21 08:30:38 CET 2012
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 7:40 AM, Michael Snoyman <michael at snoyman.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 5:46 AM, Lyndon Maydwell <maydwell at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi Michael, Café.
>> I'm writing some code using the conduit library and am encountering
>> the following error output (while the program appears to function
>> correctly) when using Data.Conduit.Lazy.
>> The error given is:
>>> profile_simple_test_data: Control.Monad.Trans.Resource.stateCleanup: There is a bug in the implementation. The mutable state is being accessed after cleanup. Please contact the maintainers.
>> A reduced code snippet that generates this error is (also attached):
>>> import Control.Monad
>>> import System.Environment
>>> import Control.Monad.IO.Class (liftIO)
>>> import System.IO
>>> import Data.Conduit.Lazy
>>> import Data.List (sort)
>>> import Data.Conduit
>>> import Prelude hiding (map)
>>> main = getArgs >>= process
>>> process args = mapM_ sorted args
>>> sorted x = runResourceT (lazyConsume $ sourceFeed x) >>= (mapM_ print . id)
>>> sourceFeed :: ResourceIO m => FilePath -> Source m String
>>> sourceFeed file = sourceIO
>>> (openFile file ReadMode)
>>> (\h -> liftIO $ do
>>> eof <- hIsEOF h
>>> if eof
>>> then return IOClosed
>>> else fmap IOOpen $ hGetLine h)
>> when run over any text file.
>> I may be doing something inconsistent with the correct use of sourceIO
>> or lazyConsume, however, I tried to follow the example at
>> as closely as possible.
>> Is this a bug, or simply an incorrect use of Conduit?
> I haven't fully debugged this yet. There's certainly a bug in the
> implementation of ResourceT, but the sample program is also wrong. You
> can't pass the result from a call to lazyConsume outside the scope of
> its ResourceT; the correct way to write sorted would be:
> sorted x = runResourceT $ lazyConsume (sourceFeed x) >>= mapM_
> (liftIO . print)
> My guess is that this is a fallout from the transition away from
> mutable variables: lazyConsume no longer has any way of knowing that
> its ResourceT has already been terminated. Perhaps a simple solution
> would be to expose a primitive that checks if the ResourceT block has
> already been finalized.
I've added a test case for this bug, and fixed it. The commit is:
The basic idea is to add an extra constructor to represent when the
ResourceT has already been closed, and expose a function
resourceActive to check the state. Can you check if this solves your
More information about the Haskell-Cafe