<div>Don&#39;t think the &quot;Haskell&#39;s Overlooked Object System&quot; paper has been posted to this thread yet:</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div><a href="http://homepages.cwi.nl/~ralf/OOHaskell/paper.pdf">http://homepages.cwi.nl/~ralf/OOHaskell/paper.pdf</a></div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div>--s<br><br>&nbsp;</div>
<div><span class="gmail_quote">On 12/18/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Lutz Donnerhacke</b> &lt;<a href="mailto:lutz@iks-jena.de">lutz@iks-jena.de</a>&gt; wrote:</span>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">* Tillmann Rendel wrote:<br>&gt; My conclusion: To make Haskell a better OO language<br><br>Haskell is not an OO language and never should be.
<br><br>&gt; (Since it&#39;s not the goal of Haskell to be any OO language at all this<br>&gt; may not be a problem)<br><br>Ack.<br>_______________________________________________<br>Haskell-Cafe mailing list<br><a href="mailto:Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org">
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org</a><br><a href="http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe">http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe</a><br></blockquote></div><br>