<div dir="ltr">Is the report available yet?<br><br>Regards<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 13:06, Don Stewart <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:dons@galois.com">dons@galois.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">daveroundy:<br>
<div class="Ih2E3d">> On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 1:06 AM, Malcolm Wallace<br>
> <<a href="mailto:malcolm.wallace@cs.york.ac.uk">malcolm.wallace@cs.york.ac.uk</a>> wrote:<br>
> > The ICFP programming contest results presentation:<br>
> > <a href="http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4697764813432201693" target="_blank">http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4697764813432201693</a><br>
> ><br>
> > Feel free to pass on this link to any other appropriate forum.<br>
><br>
> Yikes. Haskell did pretty terribly! Anyone have an idea why, given<br>
> our success in previous contests?<br>
><br>
> David (speaking as someone who was traveling that weekend and didn't<br>
> have time to compete)<br>
<br>
</div>I would say we did OK,<br>
<br>
Top 10:<br>
Java, C++, Java, Haskell, Haskell, C , C++ , C , C++, C++<br>
<br>
So now given the size of the competition, the results are starting to<br>
look more like places like topcoder or spoj, where the top entries are<br>
primarily C and C++, but with a disproportionate represenation of<br>
Haskell and OCaml at the top end.<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
-- Don<br>
</font><div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c">_______________________________________________<br>
Haskell-Cafe mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org">Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org</a><br>
<a href="http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe" target="_blank">http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Rafael Gustavo da Cunha Pereira Pinto<br>Electronic Engineer, MSc.<br>
</div>