<div dir="ltr">I've settled on scurry. Those of you interested in seeing the cabalized "Works For Me Alpha" version can check out the Google Code page below.<br><br><a href="http://code.google.com/p/scurry/">http://code.google.com/p/scurry/</a><br>
<br>Again, suggestions/comments/hatemail are encouraged.<br><br>/jve<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 10:22 PM, Gwern Branwen <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:gwern0@gmail.com">gwern0@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">On 2008.10.06 21:19:17 -0400, John Van Enk <<a href="mailto:vanenkj@gmail.com">vanenkj@gmail.com</a>> scribbled 4.3K characters:<br>
<div class="Ih2E3d">> Hmm...<br>
><br>
> I like Securry, but I'm going to go ahead and shorten it to Scurry.<br>
> I also like HaPN a lot.<br>
><br>
> Any suggestions why either of these would be better than the other? Perhaps a third party<br>
> candidate would be more appropriate?<br>
><br>
> So...<br>
> 1. Scurry<br>
> 2. HaPN<br>
> 3. ???<br>
><br>
> (bah, sorry Brandon, reply all, reply all reply all...)<br>
<br>
</div>Scurry has my vote. It is cute, it implies the software is busy and useful, it has the requisite subtle FP joke, and it doesn't seem to be already used.<br>
<br>
--<br>
<font color="#888888">gwern</font><br>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----<br>
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)<br>
<br>
iEYEAREKAAYFAkjqx90ACgkQvpDo5Pfl1oL8FwCfTSEW4BtCZM+wuWQiQ98NPCnv<br>
atEAnRXekljUuC9VKqnF+ixX+UiQXNSO<br>
=kk9h<br>
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----<br>
<br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>/jve<br>
</div>