On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 1:10 AM, Thomas Davie <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:tom.davie@gmail.com">tom.davie@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<br>
On 16 Dec 2008, at 18:40, Darrin Thompson wrote:<br>
<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
---- ----<br>
\ \ \ \ ------------<br>
\ \ \ \ \ |<br>
\ \ \ \ -----------<br>
\ \ \ \<br>
/ / / \ --------<br>
/ / / \ \ |<br>
/ / / /\ \ -------<br>
/ / / / \ \<br>
---- ---- ----<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Oh please no, please don't let the logo be something that says "Haskell, it's all about monads".</blockquote><div><br>But it's a very pretty logo. And the idea of "computation abstractions", Applicatives and Monads in particular, are a pretty big part of Haskell as a language and as a culture. Haskell, it's not exactly <i>not</i> about monads.<br>
<br>IOW: <font size="+3">⋄</font>About(Haskell, Monads)<br><br>Luke<br></div><div> </div></div>