<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 3:15 AM, <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:roconnor@theorem.ca">roconnor@theorem.ca</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div class="Ih2E3d">On Sat, 3 Jan 2009, Achim Schneider wrote:<br>
<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Step 2: Determine the winner by polling preferences, same-level<br>
preference (ambivalence) allowed<br>
(eg. place 1 for logos C and D, place 2 for A and place 3 for B)<br>
</blockquote>
<br></div>
The only reasonable method of voting using this ranking data is one of the Condorcet methods. How you break ties doesnt matter much to me. Wikimedia, Debian, Gentoo, and Software in the Public Intrest all use Schulze method for what that is worth.<br>
</blockquote></div><div><br></div>Yes. Condorcet voting picks the best compromise and is IMO the way to do this - we won't all agree on the best logo, but at least we can pick the least disliked one. <div>It doesn't need to be super sophisticated, just a box next to each logo where you can enter a rank in any range you like (1 being most preferred, empty boxing being equivalent to +Inf), allowing multiple entries to share the same rank.<br clear="all">
<div><br>-- <br>Sebastian Sylvan<br>+44(0)7857-300802<br>UIN: 44640862<br>
</div></div>