<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 10:21 PM, Bulat Ziganshin <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:bulat.ziganshin@gmail.com">bulat.ziganshin@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
Hello Sebastian,<br>
<div class="im"><br>
Tuesday, March 10, 2009, 1:08:38 AM, you wrote:<br>
> It just seems like duplicated work to me. They're still few enough<br>
> that I can scan through them and multi-select the ones I like and<br>
> then click "move to top" in a pretty short amount of time (and then refine the ranking if I care).<br>
<br>
</div>and if none of them will be among 10 most popular - it is no<br>
difference for you which one will be finally selected?</blockquote><div><br></div><div>Clearly not, because if I did have a preference among them I would've ranked them - if I didn't then I must not care either way.</div>
<div>I suspect 99% will have a few favourites, and then they will have a few that they object to, and for the rest they just don't care which ones win. Expressing that with the proposed system is easy.</div></div><br>
-- <br>Sebastian Sylvan<br>+44(0)7857-300802<br>UIN: 44640862<br>