That is strange, I'm using Ubuntu myself, and I come from Windows so know absolutely nothing about Linux whatsoever, but GHC 6.10.2 binary installed without problems.<br><br>But anyway, in this case, if you're on Windows, installation of GHC works like a charm: download, install, play. But for most of the packages on Hackage, Windows is not a good platform :)<br>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 10:19 PM, FFT <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:fft1976@gmail.com" target="_blank">fft1976@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><div>On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 12:35 PM, John Dorsey <<a href="mailto:haskell@colquitt.org" target="_blank">haskell@colquitt.org</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
> Once it's installed and working, GHC's a very decent compiler.<br>
<br>
</div>My general null hypothesis is, as Alec Baldwin put it, that a loser is<br>
a loser, or a buggy project is buggy.<br>
<br>
If GHC is robust overall (which I'm yet to find out), why is the<br>
installation so broken?<br>
<div><div></div><div>_______________________________________________<br>
Haskell-Cafe mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org" target="_blank">Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org</a><br>
<a href="http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe" target="_blank">http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>