<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 8:38 AM, Malcolm Wallace <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:Malcolm.Wallace@cs.york.ac.uk">Malcolm.Wallace@cs.york.ac.uk</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div class="im">&gt; &gt; Just refuse to use UHC until it conforms.<br>
</div><div class="im">&gt; Do you not use Hugs for the same reason?<br>
<br>
</div>Not to mention that GHC does not comply with the H&#39;98 standard either:<br>
<br>
    <a href="http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/users_guide/bugs-and-infelicities.html#vs-Haskell-defn" target="_blank">http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/users_guide/bugs-and-infelicities.html#vs-Haskell-defn</a><br>

<br>
Regards,<br>
    Malcolm</blockquote><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>It&#39;s still a matter of choice.  So we&#39;re saying there are no implementations of Haskell 98?  Sounds like the same problem C++ and C99 have.</div><div><br>
</div><div>Dave</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Haskell-Cafe mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org">Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org</a><br>
<a href="http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe" target="_blank">http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br>