let me state another way ....<br><br>as far as namespace is concerned what is division between a module's name and it's associated .cabal with it's Hs-Source-Dirs directive? This is kinda' absolute vs relative path I think.<br>
<br>Regards,<br><br>Vasili<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 2:46 AM, Vasili I. Galchin <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:vigalchin@gmail.com">vigalchin@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
let put this subject in another way ... assuming there a coding convention, vis-a-vis Haskell namespace, what is the division of responsibility between a Haskell module and it's associated .cabal?<br><br>Regards,<br><font color="#888888"><br>
Vasili <br></font><div><div></div><div class="h5"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 2:26 AM, Vasili I. Galchin <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:vigalchin@gmail.com" target="_blank">vigalchin@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Hello,<br> <br> Should namespace designation be specified in modules or in the .cabal file? Or to put it another way should a relative namespace be specified in a Haskell module and the remaining "top" part be specified in the associated .cabal file? Of course, yes/no answers are probably not sufficient ... i.e. please elaborate.<br>
<br>Kind regards, Vasili<br>
</blockquote></div><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>