<br><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 10:58 AM, Duncan Coutts <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:duncan.coutts@worc.ox.ac.uk">duncan.coutts@worc.ox.ac.uk</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote style="BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; PADDING-LEFT: 1ex" class="gmail_quote">
<div class="im">On Wed, 2009-09-09 at 20:19 +0100, Sebastian Sylvan wrote:<br>><br>><br>> On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 1:28 PM, Duncan Coutts<br>> <<a href="mailto:duncan.coutts@worc.ox.ac.uk">duncan.coutts@worc.ox.ac.uk</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>><br></div>
<div class="im">> If the Windows users can come to a consensus on whether the<br>> default should be global or user, then we can easily switch<br>> it. The same applies for the default global or user<br>
> installation paths.<br><br>> I think it's morally right to run as user by default. Yes, the windows<br>> culture has some legacy that may, on occasion, make it slightly harder<br>> to use "well behaved" programs, but it's fairly minor these days.<br>
<br></div>So is it just a matter of switching the default, or do the default user<br>paths have to change too? Is there any recommended/sensible place for<br>installing per-user applications on Windows? (I think there wasn't on<br>
XP, but perhaps that's changed on Vista/Win7)<br><br></blockquote>
<div> </div>
<div>I think it's %LOCALAPPDATA%</div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div></div>-- <br>Sebastian Sylvan<br>