<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type" />
<title></title>
</head>
<body>
Nice, thank you for the great work.<br />
<br />
Browsing the reverse dependencies of popular packages like "bytestring"<br />
http://bifunctor.homelinux.net/~roel/cgi-bin/hackage-scripts/revdeps/bytestring-0.9.1.5<br />
can be improved a bit.<br />
<br />
1) Can you please sort the reverse dependent package names? That makes it easier to find packages with certain names.<br />
<br />
2) I found the columns "Direct" and "Indirect" confusing until i found out that they show the number of reverse dependencies for those packages themselves and are not related to direct/indirect dependencies of the current package. I don't think it is necessary to provide those data here and i would be in favor of reducing the information overload by leaving those data to each package detail page.<br />
<br />
3) Can you try to print the reverse packages horizontally instead of vertically in tables? Browsing two long tables of direct/indirect reverse dpependencies like for "bytestring" makes it tedious to get an overview.<br />
<br />
Besides that, i am quite happy.<br />
<br />
Thanks,<br />
Lenny
</body>
</html>