<div class="gmail_quote">I'm thinking of switching the statistics library over to using vector. uvector is pretty bit-rotted in comparison to vector at this point, and it's really seeing no development, while vector is The Shiny Future. Roman, would you call the vector library good enough to use in production at the moment?</div>
<div class="gmail_quote"><br></div><div class="gmail_quote"><br></div><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 9:59 AM, stefan kersten <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:sk@k-hornz.de">sk@k-hornz.de</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">hi,<br>
<br>
i've been using the vector [1] library for implementing some signal processing<br>
algorithms, but now i'd like to use the statistics [2] package on my data, which<br>
is based on the uvector [3] library. is there a (straightforward) way of<br>
converting between vectors and uvectors, preferrably O(1)?<br>
<br>
thanks,<br>
<sk><br>
<br>
[1] <a href="http://hackage.haskell.org/package/vector" target="_blank">http://hackage.haskell.org/package/vector</a><br>
[2] <a href="http://hackage.haskell.org/package/statistics" target="_blank">http://hackage.haskell.org/package/statistics</a><br>
[3] <a href="http://hackage.haskell.org/package/uvector" target="_blank">http://hackage.haskell.org/package/uvector</a><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Haskell-Cafe mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org">Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org</a><br>
<a href="http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe" target="_blank">http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br>