<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 3:37 AM, Ivan Lazar Miljenovic <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:ivan.miljenovic@gmail.com">ivan.miljenovic@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div class="im">Marc Weber <<a href="mailto:marco-oweber@gmx.de">marco-oweber@gmx.de</a>> writes:<br>
<br>
> Hi Qi,<br>
><br>
> have a look at brainfuck language. Its turing complete as Python, Haskell, etc<br>
> are. Then you'll learn that the quesntion "Can I do everything possible"<br>
> is not at all important. You have to ask instead: Can I complete my<br>
> task in reasonable time and with reasonable runtime performance etc.<br>
<br>
</div>And in a way that makes the code maintainable.<br>
<div class="im"><br>
> For most use cases Haskell is a good choice - the only real things<br>
> I'm missing are<br>
> - nice stack traces<br>
> - completion support - because I find it relaxing not having to looking<br>
> all names. This could be fixed to some extend though..<br>
<br>
</div>If you mean whilst writing your code, this is an editor issue (I believe<br>
scion aims to help writing cross-editor utilities for things like<br>
this). ghci also has tab-completion, and ghc-mod provides such<br>
functionality in Emacs.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Is scion still being developed? I have the impression it's dead now. Really a shame, I think it has a good solid design and just needs work/polish.</div><div>
<br></div><div>Jason</div></div>