<div dir="ltr"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 3:51 PM, Felipe Lessa <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:felipe.lessa@gmail.com">felipe.lessa@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div class="im">On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 9:41 AM, Tim Matthews <<a href="mailto:tim.matthews7@gmail.com">tim.matthews7@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> I have often wondered "OK haml implemented now what about sass". Michael<br>
> Snoyman what is your opinions on sass? Would a sass inspired syntax like you<br>
> did with the haml->hamlet fit in well and if so, as it often best to keep<br>
> styles separate, could a quasi quoted language live in in a separate haskell<br>
> module and then at run time it recreates the separate css files on first<br>
> launch?<br>
<br>
</div>A wholly statically-verified-by-the-compiler Web framework?! We are<br>
going to avoid success at all costs even more, I'd say. ;-)<br>
<br></blockquote><div>I hope you mean *fail* to avoid success at all costs ;)</div><div><br></div><div>Michael</div></div></div>