<div dir="ltr"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 1:03 PM, Tim Matthews <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:tim.matthews7@gmail.com">tim.matthews7@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div class="gmail_quote"><div class="im">On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 9:20 PM, Michael Snoyman <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:michael@snoyman.com" target="_blank">michael@snoyman.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204);padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="ltr">Quick update: I'm including the "Stylish" code in the hamlet package now, and renaming it to "Camlet" (CSS-hamlet). I'm also including something called "Jamlet", which doesn't do much besides variable interpolation. As you might guess, it's for Javascript. I mention it at the end of my most recent blog post[1].<div>
<br></div><div>Michael</div><br></div></blockquote></div><div><br>While It's just a name and not really important: hamlet was haml so I first imagined sasset, sasslet or another name from one of the works of Shakespeare but I then really liked stylish as I thought it would tell that something with solid foundations and theory could still appear, hip and pretty.<br>
<br>What is important though is the code. This is absolutely great and success just keeps getting harder to avoid.<br></div></div><br></blockquote><div>This is by no means a final decision; I'm open to being convinced that other names are better. But I'll point out the main reason for the Camlet/Jamlet name choice: easy to remember and type. I found "stylish" to be much harder to get out than "camlet"; that might just be because I'm so used to hamlet already, but that's exactly my goal here: make these three templating systems work together nicely to make the developers life a little bit easier.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Michael </div></div></div>