<font face="courier new,monospace"><br></font><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Henning Thielemann <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:lemming@henning-thielemann.de">lemming@henning-thielemann.de</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;"><div class="im">Blake Rain wrote:<br>
</div></blockquote><div></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;"><div class="im">
<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
Adjoint is even more of a fiddle, but actually a one-liner after<br>
reusing bits of the determinant function (including the<br>
determinant function).<br>
</blockquote>
<br></div>
Isn't Adjoint just 'transpose' followed by complex conjugate?<div><div></div><div class="h5"><br></div></div></blockquote></div><br>I think he refers to the matrix of cofactors. <br><br>Francesco<br><br>