<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Edward Amsden <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:eca7215@cs.rit.edu">eca7215@cs.rit.edu</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div class="im"><br>
</div>So I'm feeling a bit elated that I've sparked my first theoretical<br>
discussion in cafe, though I don't have much to contribute. :\<br>
<br>
However in the interests of the original question, I guess I should clarify.<br>
<br>
What we do in our physics class seems to be what is being called<br>
"interval analysis" in this discussion. We have experimental values<br>
with absolute uncertainties, and we need to propagate those<br>
uncertainties in a deterministic way through formulas. I don't think<br>
my professor would take kindly to a random sampling approach.<br>
<br>
The intervals library seemed a bit like what I'm looking for, except<br>
that it appears to be broken for the later ghc 6 versions and ghc 7.</blockquote><div> </div><div>The package should build fine, but hackage was flipping out because I commented out a pattern guard, and it looked like a misplaced haddock comment.<br>
</div><div><br></div><div>I've pushed a new version of intervals to mollify hackage. </div><div><br></div><div>It (or the old version) should cabal install just fine.</div><div><br></div><div>-Edward Kmett</div></div>