<div dir="ltr">On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 13:38, Yitzchak Gale <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:gale@sefer.org">gale@sefer.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div class="im">Brandon Allbery wrote:<br>
> Umm, I think the semigroups package will break everything that creates<br>
> Monoid instances anyway.<br>
<br>
</div>It has never broken anything for me. What do you mean?<br>
</blockquote></div><br>Anything useful has to be modified to depend on SemiGroup as well to get mconcat or its replacement; that's why you jumped the proposal to begin with.... As others have noted, this is a rather intrusive change to the Haskell ecosystem.<div>
<br></div><div>*If* it has in fact been decided to go ahead with it, *then* this proposal should be merged with yours since the best time to do it is when mconcat is being relocated anyway. I don't think we've made it past the "if", especially given the comments so far.<br>
<div><div><br></div>-- <br>brandon s allbery <a href="mailto:allbery.b@gmail.com" target="_blank">allbery.b@gmail.com</a><br>wandering unix systems administrator (available) (412) 475-9364 vm/sms<br>
<br>
</div></div></div>