<div>If i understand correctly, what we called generics is what so called reflection. It allow you to introspect type structure.</div><a href="http://haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/ghc-prim-0.2.0.0/GHC-Generics.html#g:4">http://haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/ghc-prim-0.2.0.0/GHC-Generics.html#g:4</a><br>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 12:03 AM, yrazes <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:yrazes@gmail.com">yrazes@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
Hi, <br><br>Maybe you remember my case.<br>I was trying to compare some aspects of these languages.<br>Well... I found that I can compare reflection, support for generics, simplicity and safe code.<br>I just want to ask if you have more information for reflection in Haskell.<br>
I read that there is no enough for dynamics to support complete reflection.<br>I hope someone can help me this time :)<br><br>Julita <br>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
Haskell-Cafe mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org">Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org</a><br>
<a href="http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe" target="_blank">http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><a href="http://www.yi-programmer.com/blog/">http://www.yi-programmer.com/blog/</a><br>