After eight years I'm still discovering why various decisions made in Haskell are right.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 11:20 AM, Robert Clausecker <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:fuzxxl@gmail.com">fuzxxl@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Image you would create your own language with a paradigm similar to<br>
Haskell or have to chance to change Haskell without the need to keep any<br>
compatibility. What stuff would you add to your language, what stuff<br>
would you remove and what problems would you solve completely different?<br>
<br>
Thanks in advance for all answers, yours<br>
<br>
Robert Clausecker<br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Haskell-Cafe mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org">Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org</a><br>
<a href="http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe" target="_blank">http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br>