<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 9:25 PM, Brent Yorgey <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:byorgey@seas.upenn.edu">byorgey@seas.upenn.edu</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div class="im">On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 10:51:58AM +0000, Steve Horne wrote:<br>
><br>
> If I specify both extensions (-XMultiParamTypeClasses and<br>
> -XFlexibleInstances) it seems to work, but needing two language<br>
> extensions is a pretty strong hint that I'm doing it the wrong way.<br>
<br>
</div>Not necessarily. These two extensions in particular (and especially<br>
the second) are quite uncontroversial.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I really don't know much about the subject, but</div><div><br></div><div><a href="http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/haskell-prime/wiki/MultiParamTypeClassesDilemma">http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/haskell-prime/wiki/MultiParamTypeClassesDilemma</a></div>
<div><br></div><div>does not sound "uncontroversial" to me. That's why I avoided them so far.</div><div><br></div><div>- Chris</div></div>