Apparently on such solid ground that you hinder their critical thinking skills by answering for them.<br><br><br>On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 9:24 PM, Donn Cave <<a href="mailto:donn@avvanta.com">donn@avvanta.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> Quoth KC <<a href="mailto:kc1956@gmail.com">kc1956@gmail.com</a>>,<br>><br>>> On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 7:44 PM, Jerzy Karczmarczuk<br>>> <<a href="mailto:jerzy.karczmarczuk@unicaen.fr">jerzy.karczmarczuk@unicaen.fr</a>> wrote:<br>
>><br>>>> ... but the question of purity of a program - in my opinion - concerns<br>>>> the program, and nothing else.<br>>><br>>> You might be thinking of software engineering purity.<br>
><br>> Or software engineers might be thinking of purity in the same way.<br>> I personally hope I think of purity in a way that's of some practical<br>> use in terms of Haskell programs, and I would hope software engineers<br>
> in general would do likewise. From that perspective, it seems to me<br>> that M. Karczmarczuk is on pretty solid ground.<br>><br>> Donn<br>><br><br><br>-- <br>--<br>Regards,<br>KC<br><br>