Hi,<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 5:12 PM, Ryan Newton <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:rrnewton@gmail.com">rrnewton@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div><ul><li>Would the current Haskell.org / hackage infrastructure benefit from the donation of a dedicated VM with good bandwidth/uptime?</li></ul></div></blockquote><div>I can think about at the very least one project (the one you mention below) that would benefit from it. But I think there are a *lot* more that I don't know about too. </div>
<div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div><div class="gmail_quote"><div>Are there any updates to this in the last year? Is anybody running a mirror?</div>
</div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I know about <a href="http://hackage.factisresearch.com/">http://hackage.factisresearch.com/</a> and <a href="http://hackage2.uptoisomorphism.net/">http://hackage2.uptoisomorphism.net/</a> but they both run Hackage2.0 I think. </div>
<div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="gmail_quote">The other reason I've been thinking about this is the scoutess project. More public testing or continuous integration facilities would require more hardware resources.</div>
</blockquote><div><br></div><div>Yes. We have talked about this with Duncan. He was wondering whether there was a way to get scoutess to handle the "build bot" part of Hackage2.0 and we will develop it so that it can. However, with Jeremy we intend to let people distribute their builds on several machines so you will not be forced to have one machine do all the work. </div>
<div><br></div><div>Of course we are not there yet, but I thought you would appreciate hearing about what is planned for scoutess.</div></div><div><br></div>-- <br>Alp<br>