<div dir="ltr">On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Johan Tibell <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:johan.tibell@gmail.com" target="_blank">johan.tibell@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div class="im">On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Bryan O'Sullivan <<a href="mailto:bos@serpentine.com">bos@serpentine.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> I propose that the sense of the recommendation around upper bounds in the<br>
> PVP be reversed: upper bounds should be specified only when there is a known<br>
> problem with a new version of a depended-upon package.<br>
<br>
</div>This argument precisely captures my feelings on this subject. I will<br>
be removing upper bounds next time I make releases of my packages.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>So we are certain that the rounds of failures that led to their being *added* will never happen again?</div><div><br>
</div></div>-- <br>brandon s allbery <a href="mailto:allbery.b@gmail.com" target="_blank">allbery.b@gmail.com</a><br>wandering unix systems administrator (available) (412) 475-9364 vm/sms<br>
<br>
</div>