<div dir="ltr">On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 9:59 AM, Mike Meyer <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mwm@mired.org" target="_blank">mwm@mired.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
I have to ask if your core language for Maple was larger than Maple?</blockquote></div><br>I can think of several reasons why it would make sense, especially if the core language is much harder for a human to write for but much easier to optimize and/or generate machine code for.<br clear="all">
<div><br></div>-- <br><div dir="ltr"><div>brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates</div><div><a href="mailto:allbery.b@gmail.com" target="_blank">allbery.b@gmail.com</a> <a href="mailto:ballbery@sinenomine.net" target="_blank">ballbery@sinenomine.net</a></div>
<div>unix/linux, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure <a href="http://sinenomine.net" target="_blank">http://sinenomine.net</a></div></div><br>
</div>