<p>Pandoc wouldn't affect popcon though, since it doesn't depend on ghc; it's a binary package, and iirc only depends on libgmp at runtime.</p>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Jul 21, 2014 6:49 AM, "Phil Xiaojun Hu" <<a href="mailto:phil@cnphil.com">phil@cnphil.com</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 06:05:28PM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:<br>
> Hi,<br>
><br>
> more numbers: Of the roughly 150k machines taking part in the Debian<br>
> popularity contest, 4936 (3%) have GHC installed, and but only 898 (0.5%<br>
> ) use it: <a href="https://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=ghc" target="_blank">https://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=ghc</a><br>
><br>
> And that might include some xmonad users that you wouldn’t necessary<br>
> consider Haskell programmers.<br>
<br>
Users of xmonad and pandoc certainly add up to that number.<br>
Cabal-install would be a better reference than GHC, with 1467 (0.8%) users<br>
have haskell-platform installed:<br>
<a href="https://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=haskell-platform" target="_blank">https://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=haskell-platform</a><br>
<br>
---<br>
Phil Xiaojun Hu<br>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
Haskell-Cafe mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org">Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org</a><br>
<a href="http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe" target="_blank">http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div>