Bang patterns, ~ patterns, and lazy let
simonpj at microsoft.com
Tue Feb 7 17:37:43 EST 2006
Applying the rules on the wiki, the first step is to translate the first
expression into a tuple binding, omitting the implicit ~:
Not so! I changed it a few days ago after talking to Ben, to a simpler
form that works nicely for recursive bindings too. Darn - I forgot to
change the rules at the bottom.
Anyway, read the section "Let and where bindings". Sorry about the rules
at the end.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Haskell-prime